Coles v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Probation and Parole et al
| Kenneth Coles |
| Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Probation and Parole and Raymond Lawler |
| 1:2010cv01976 |
| September 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Huntingdon |
| William W. Caldwell |
| Martin C. Carlson |
| Mandamus and Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - AND NOW, this 1st day of Dec., 2010, upon con. of the R&R of the mag. judge 8 , filed 10/26/10, to which no objs. were filed, & upon independent review of the record, it is ordered that: 1. The mag. judge& #039;s report is adopted. 2. Petnr.'s mtn. to proceed IFP 7 is granted. 3. Petnr.'s petn. for a writ of mandamus 1 is dism'd. 4. The Clerk of Crt. shall close this file. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 12/1/10. (am)
|
|
Filing
8
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 7) is GRANTED but IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Plaintiffs complaint be dismissed for the failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Objections to R&R due by 11/12/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on October 26, 2010. (kjn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
