Wholaver v. Wetzel et al

Respondent: Attorney General of Pennsylvania, John E. Wetzel, Louis Folino and Marirosa Lamas
Petitioner: Ernest R. Wholaver
Case Number: 1:2011cv00164
Filed: January 24, 2011
Court: Pennsylvania Middle District Court
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Dauphin
Referring Judge: AM
Presiding Judge: Christopher C. Conner
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 10, 2011 3 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Motion for leave to proceed IFP 2 is GRANTED.; 2. Capital Habeas Unit of FPD office for EDPA APPOINTED to rep ptnr Wholaver in captioned action.; 3. Any state proceedings for execution of ptnr Earnest R. Wholav er, Jr., are STAYED pending disposition of anticipated petition for writ of habeas corpus or until further order of court.; It is further ORDERED that parties shall comply w/ the following schedule for remaider of this proceeding... (see Paras 1-3 for specifics). (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 02/10/11. (ki)
August 31, 2011 5 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER re: motion to stay federal proceedings 4 - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Ptnr's motion to stay federal proceedings 4 is GRANTED - litigation in this h/c proceeding STAYED pending exhaustion of state ct remedies of any unexhausted claim s.; 2. Stay of execution issued by ct in order of 2/10/11 3 shall REMAIN IN EFFECT.; 3. Ptnr has 30 days to file his app for state post-conviction relief if he has not already done so.; 4. Ptnr to advise ct in writing re: status of his state ct pro ceedings by 11/28/11 & every 60 days thereafter.; 5. If ptnr is denied post-conviction releif either party shall notify ct w/in 30 days from time of final denial & request that stay of litigation be vacated.l; 6. Clrk of Ct shall place this matter on the Civil Suspense Docket pending exhaustion of state remedies. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 08/31/11. (ki)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wholaver v. Wetzel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of Pennsylvania
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John E. Wetzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Louis Folino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Marirosa Lamas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ernest R. Wholaver
Represented By: Hunter S. Labovitz
Represented By: Tracy Ulstad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.