Ball v. Struthers et al
| Dawn Ball |
| Lt. Sweally, Sgt. Johnson, C.O. Bowers, Sgt. Kennedy, C.O. Struthers, Trudy Temple, Lt. Moser and Lt. Hummel |
| 1:2011cv01265 |
| July 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Lycoming |
| LQ |
| Yvette Kane |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM OPINION - re 87 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by C.O. Struthers, Trudy Temple, Lt. Sweally, Sgt. Johnson, Lt. Hummel, Lt. Moser, C.O. Bowers, Sgt. Kennedy -....the defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, this case is DISMISSED and the clerk is directed to CLOSE this file. (Please see original order for further details).Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on 07/19/12. (pjr)
|
|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM ORDER - We will DENY these objections which we construe as motions to reconsider. Ball is directed to continue to comply with the filing deadlines previously set by this Court and IT IS ORDERED that any requests for continuance or stay mus t be made individually by Ball in each of her cases along with factual averments specific to each particular case identifying the deadline she wishes to extend or stay, and explaining why a stay or continuance is necessary.Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on 07/10/12. (pjr)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER denying 105 Motion to Stay - IT IS ORDERED that any requests for continuance or stay must be made individually by Ball in each of her cases along with factual averments specific to each particular case identifying the deadline she wishes to extend or stay, and explaining why a stay or continuance is necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on 06/20/12. (pjr)
|
|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is ORDERED that the Pltfs motion to compel, (Doc. 84 ), is DENIED, in part, and, GRANTED in part, as follows: First, Balls request that the Court personally supervise the Pltfs document review is DENIED, and any doc ument review is confined solely to the discovery expressly approved by the Court. Second, IT IS ORDERED that the Dfts shall make arrangements for a non-party discovery proctor in the future if the Dfts elect to conduct a document review at the insti tution for Ball. Depending upon the volume of these documents, Dfts may in their discretion satisfy their discovery obligations bysimply mailing a full, bates-stamped set of records to Ball. The Dfts shall notify the Court, no later than May 28, 2012, that they have been able to complete this process. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on April 19, 2012. (kjn )
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM ORDER - Denying 69 MOTION to Compel filed by Dawn Ball.Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on March 30, 2012. (kjn )
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, the plaintiffs motions for subpoenasand for oral depositions (Docs. 20 and 22 ), are DENIED, without prejudice to the parties pursuing appropriate discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on October 13, 2011. (kjn )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
