Watkins v. Sauers et al
| Matthew D Watkins |
| PA State Attorney General and Debra Sauers |
| 1:2011cv01825 |
| October 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Forest |
| PT |
| William W. Caldwell |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - AND NOW, this 10th day of October, 2012, upon consideration of Petitioner's motion for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. 1), and pursuant to the accompanying Memorandum, it is ordered that: 1. T he petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28U.S.C. § 2254 motion is dismissed as time-barred. 2. A certificate of appealability is denied. 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this file. 1 (See memo for complete details.) 33 30 31 . Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 10/10/12. (am, ) (Main Document 37 replaced on 10/10/2012) (am, ).
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2012, it is ordered that: 1. W/in 21 days of the date of this order, petnr. may file a brief opposing the court's determination that the 2254 petn. is time-barred. The brief shall also addr ess any prejudice he has suffered from the court's raising of the timeliness issue. 2. Respondents shall have 14 days from receipt of petnr.'s brief to file a reply brief. 1 (See memo for complete details.) Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 4/26/12. (am, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
