Reichart v. Prison Health Services, SCI-Camp Hill et al
| Richard D Reichart |
| Prison Health Services, SCI-Camp Hill and Premier Eyelab Group |
| 1:2011cv01992 |
| October 26, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Cumberland |
| PT |
| William W. Caldwell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2012, in accord. w/the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED that: 1. Premier Eye Care Group's mtn. to dismiss 26 is GRANTED. 2. Prison Health Service's mtn. to dismiss 32 is GRANT ED. 3. Reichert's mtn. to file an amd. complt. 31 is GRANTED. 4. Plf. is granted 21 days from the dt. of this order to file an amd. complt. in accord. w/the foregoing memorandum. 5. The amd. complt. must be complete in all respects & must be a new pleading which stands by itself, w/out reference to the orig. complt. already filed. 6. Failure to submit an amd. complt. in compliance w/the requirements of the accompanying memorandum will result in dismissal of this action w/out prejudice. 7. The Clerk of Crt. is dir. to send plf. two copies of this court's form civil-rights complt. which plf. shall use for his amd. complt. should he chose to file one. (See memo for complete details.) Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 6/26/12. (am, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
