Thomas v. Thomas et al
Timothy M. Thomas |
Diana Marie Thomas, David M. Dougherty, Daniel Diehl and Kathy Jo Winterbottom |
1:2011cv02336 |
December 19, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
Franklin |
William W. Caldwell |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2012, upon consideration of defendants, Diana Thomass and Ronald Weagleys, motion (Doc. 28) to dismiss the amended complaint, it is ordered that: 1. The motion is granted. 2. Plaintiffs amended complaint (Doc. 27) is dismissed without leave to amend. 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this file. (See memo for complete details.) Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 10/15/12. (am, ) |
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - AND NOW, this 15th day of June, 2012, upon consideration of defts.' motions 10 18 12 , to dismiss the complt. 1 , it is ordered that: 1. The mtns. are granted, & the complt. is hereby dism'd. 2. W/in 21 days of the dt. of this order plf. may file an amd. complt. setting forth his federal & state wiretapping claim against Diana Thomas...and/or also file a mtn. to amend his claim against Daniel. 3. If plf. fails to comply w/paragraph 2 of this order, this action will be closed. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 6/15/12. (am, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.