Hanna et al v. Avila
| Richard M. Hanna and Hanna Inc. |
| Eli N. Avila |
| 1:2012cv00256 |
| February 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Dauphin |
| William W. Caldwell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER/ORDER REMANDING CASE - AND NOW, this 9th day of August, 2012, it is ORDERED that: 1. Plfs.' mtn. 11 to remand this case is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk of Crt. shall remand this case to the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin Cty., PA, & close this file. Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 8/9/12. (am, )
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Upon consideration of Defendant's Motion 6 for judgment on the pleadings, Judgment on the pleadings is granted in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs on Count I, the procedural due process claim; Count II, the subst antive due process claim; and Count III, the equal protection claim. Plaintiffs are granted twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint setting forth their equal protection claim with sufficient factual allegations. 3. If no amended complaint is filed, the court shall consider whether the state-law claims should proceed. Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 5/30/12. (pw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
