Illes v. Kcomt et al
Plaintiff: Richard Illes, Sr.
Defendant: Sheila McGinnis, Colleen Newfield, Barry Beavens, Christian Kcomt and David Underwood
Case Number: 1:2012cv00395
Filed: March 1, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Cumberland
Presiding Judge: William W. Caldwell
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 133 MEMORANDUM re. dft's MOTION for Summary Judgment 101 and pltf's MOTION to Strike 127 (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 01/27/14. (ma)
October 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry): Pltf is granted until 10/25/13, to submit a brief showing cause why summary judgment should not be entered in Dfnt's favor on the grounds of qualified immunity. Failure to respond dur ing the allotted time will result in summary judgment being entered for Dft, and the dismissal of the action in its entirety. In the event that Pltf does respond, Dft may have (14) days from the date of Pltfs response to issue a reply.Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 10/10/13. (ma)
February 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 96 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2013, upon consideration of Plaintiffs motion to compel discovery (doc. 87), and Defendants response thereto, and pursuant to the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs mo tion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.2. Defendant McGinnis shall respond to Interrogatories 3, 7, 18, and 20 within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. 3. Defendant Underwood shall respond to Request for Admission 28 within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. 87 4. Within twenty (20) days of the date of this order, Defendants McGinnis and Underwood shall show cause why costs should not be imposed pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(C). (See memo for complete details.) Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 2/11/13. (am)
December 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 85 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - AND NOW, this 10th day of December, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants motions to dismiss (docs. 62, 69), and Plaintiffs response thereto, and pursuant to the accompanying Memorandum, it is ordered that: 1. Defendants motio n to dismiss Count I of Plaintiffs complaint is DENIED. 2. Defendant Kcomts motion to strike Count II of Plaintiffs complaint is GRANTED. 3. Defendants motions to dismiss Count III of Plaintiffs complaint are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plain tiffs state law breach of confidentiality claims are dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants. 4. Defendants motions to dismiss Count IV of Plaintiffs complaint are GRANTED. This count is dismissed with prejudice.5. Defendant Kcomts motion to dismiss Plaintiffs request for punitive damages and injunctive relief is GRANTED. 62 69 (See memo for complete details.) Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 12/10/12. (am)
July 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - AND NOW, this 10th day of July, 2012, upon con. of deft.'s mtns. for SJ & to dismiss 3 , & plf.'s mtn. for SJ 36 , it is ordered that: 1. Deft.'s mtn. for SJ on Ct. II of plf.'s complt. is GRANTED w/out l eave to amend. 2. Deft.'s mtn. for SJ on Cts. III & IV of plf.'s complt. is DENIED. 3. Deft.'s mtn. to dismiss Cts. III & IV of plf.'s complt. 1 is GRANTED w/out prejudice. 4. Deft.'s mtn. to dismiss plf.'s request for prel. injunc. is GRANTED. 5. Plf.'s mtn. for SJ 36 is DENIED. 6. Plf. is granted leave to amend Cts. III & IV of his complt. w/in 21 days hereof, if he desires to do so. (See memo for complete details.) Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 7/10/12. (am, )
June 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - AND NOW, this 19th day of June, 2012, upon consideration of plf.'s mtns. to compel discovery & for reconsideration, defts.' responses thereto, & pur. to the accompanying memorandum, it is ordered that: 1. Plf.'s mtn. to compel discovery 30 is DENIED as moot. 2. Plf.'s mtn. for reconsideration 40 is DENIED. (See memo for complete details.) Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 6/19/12. (am, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Illes v. Kcomt et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheila McGinnis
Represented By: John J. Hatzell, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Colleen Newfield
Represented By: John J. Hatzell, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barry Beavens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christian Kcomt
Represented By: Jonathan W Bradbard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Underwood
Represented By: John J. Hatzell, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Illes, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?