Illes v. Kcomt et al
Richard Illes, Sr. |
Sheila McGinnis, Colleen Newfield, Barry Beavens, Christian Kcomt and David Underwood |
1:2012cv00395 |
March 1, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
Cumberland |
William W. Caldwell |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 133 MEMORANDUM re. dft's MOTION for Summary Judgment 101 and pltf's MOTION to Strike 127 (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 01/27/14. (ma) |
Filing 122 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry): Pltf is granted until 10/25/13, to submit a brief showing cause why summary judgment should not be entered in Dfnt's favor on the grounds of qualified immunity. Failure to respond dur ing the allotted time will result in summary judgment being entered for Dft, and the dismissal of the action in its entirety. In the event that Pltf does respond, Dft may have (14) days from the date of Pltfs response to issue a reply.Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 10/10/13. (ma) |
Filing 96 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2013, upon consideration of Plaintiffs motion to compel discovery (doc. 87), and Defendants response thereto, and pursuant to the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs mo tion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.2. Defendant McGinnis shall respond to Interrogatories 3, 7, 18, and 20 within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. 3. Defendant Underwood shall respond to Request for Admission 28 within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. 87 4. Within twenty (20) days of the date of this order, Defendants McGinnis and Underwood shall show cause why costs should not be imposed pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(C). (See memo for complete details.) Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 2/11/13. (am) |
Filing 85 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - AND NOW, this 10th day of December, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants motions to dismiss (docs. 62, 69), and Plaintiffs response thereto, and pursuant to the accompanying Memorandum, it is ordered that: 1. Defendants motio n to dismiss Count I of Plaintiffs complaint is DENIED. 2. Defendant Kcomts motion to strike Count II of Plaintiffs complaint is GRANTED. 3. Defendants motions to dismiss Count III of Plaintiffs complaint are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plain tiffs state law breach of confidentiality claims are dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants. 4. Defendants motions to dismiss Count IV of Plaintiffs complaint are GRANTED. This count is dismissed with prejudice.5. Defendant Kcomts motion to dismiss Plaintiffs request for punitive damages and injunctive relief is GRANTED. 62 69 (See memo for complete details.) Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 12/10/12. (am) |
Filing 53 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - AND NOW, this 10th day of July, 2012, upon con. of deft.'s mtns. for SJ & to dismiss 3 , & plf.'s mtn. for SJ 36 , it is ordered that: 1. Deft.'s mtn. for SJ on Ct. II of plf.'s complt. is GRANTED w/out l eave to amend. 2. Deft.'s mtn. for SJ on Cts. III & IV of plf.'s complt. is DENIED. 3. Deft.'s mtn. to dismiss Cts. III & IV of plf.'s complt. 1 is GRANTED w/out prejudice. 4. Deft.'s mtn. to dismiss plf.'s request for prel. injunc. is GRANTED. 5. Plf.'s mtn. for SJ 36 is DENIED. 6. Plf. is granted leave to amend Cts. III & IV of his complt. w/in 21 days hereof, if he desires to do so. (See memo for complete details.) Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 7/10/12. (am, ) |
Filing 52 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - AND NOW, this 19th day of June, 2012, upon consideration of plf.'s mtns. to compel discovery & for reconsideration, defts.' responses thereto, & pur. to the accompanying memorandum, it is ordered that: 1. Plf.'s mtn. to compel discovery 30 is DENIED as moot. 2. Plf.'s mtn. for reconsideration 40 is DENIED. (See memo for complete details.) Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 6/19/12. (am, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.