Hampton v. Wetzel et al
| Shawn Hampton |
| William Williams, Gary Sowash, Richard S. Ellers, Margaret M. Gordon, Marirosa Lamas, Dorina L. Varner and John E. Wetzel |
| 1:2012cv00434 |
| March 8, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Centre |
| EC |
| Christopher C. Conner |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER denying pltf's motion for appt of counsel 61 . (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 6/10/14. (ki)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER (Memorandum 54 filed previously as separate docket entry) GRANTING in part & DENYING in part defts' MSJ 42 as follows... (see Paras 1-5 for specific details) & noting scheduling order will issue @ convenience of the court. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 3/31/14. (*Note deferred judgment)(ki)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER denying plaintiff's motion for prelminary injunction 16 as moot. (See order for complete details.)Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 10/15/12. (ki)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting pltf's motion to amend complaint 11 & directing Clrk of Ct to add Shawn Kephart & Rev. Ulli Klemm as defts & fwd amended complaint 11 to USM for service on all named defts. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 05/09/12. (ki)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
