Ball v. Sipe
Dawn Ball |
Lt. Sipe |
1:2012cv00537 |
March 26, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
Lycoming |
Martin C. Carlson |
Yvette Kane |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 68 Report and Recommendations. Granting 56 Defendant Sipe's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's Objection 56 is OVERRULED. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 2/13/15. (pw) |
Filing 54 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Accordingly, this 18th day of June, 2014, it is ORDERED that the plaintiffs motion to compel, (Doc. 44.), is DENIED, in part, and, GRANTED in part, as follows: First, Balls request for an extension of time is GRANTED an d the following pre-trial schedule will apply in this case:Close of Discovery: September 29, 2014. Dispositive Motions and Supporting Briefs Due: September 29, 2014. Deadline toConsent to Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate: September 29, 2014. In all other respects the Motion to Compel is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on June 18, 2014. (kjn) |
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION denying the 15 MOTION to Revoke Plaintff's In Forma Pauperis Status. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on July 12, 2012. (kjn ) |
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM ORDER - We will DENY these objections which we construe as motions to reconsider. Ball is directed to continue to comply with the filing deadlines previously set by this Court and IT IS ORDERED that any requests for continuance or stay mus t be made individually by Ball in each of her cases along with factual averments specific to each particular case identifying the deadline she wishes to extend or stay, and explaining why a stay or continuance is necessary.Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on 07/10/12. (pjr) |
Filing 22 ORDER denying 20 Motion to Stay - IT IS ORDERED that any requests for continuance or stay must be made individually by Ball in each of her cases along with factual averments specific to each particular case identifying the deadline she wishes to extend or stay, and explaining why a stay or continuance is necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on 06/20/12. (pjr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ball v. Sipe | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dawn Ball | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Lt. Sipe | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.