Green v. Fisher et al
| Clyde Green |
| State Prison Smithfield, Jon Fisher, R. Sue Hannah, William Driebelbis, James Fouse, William Felton, Tim Roher, Corizon, Ronald Long, Christina Doll and Department of Corrections |
| 1:2012cv00982 |
| May 24, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Huntingdon |
| AM |
| Sylvia H. Rambo |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
MEMORANDUM re Mtns for Summary Judgment 79 and 92 (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 11/19/14. (ma)
|
|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM re MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 45 filed by Ronald Long, Corizon, Christina Doll and MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 48 filed by Jon Fisher, R. Sue Hannah, Tim Roher, James Fouse, Tim Felton, William Driebelbis. (Order to follow as separate docket entry) Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 01/08/14. (ma)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying pltf's Motion for Reconsideration 40 Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 04/03/13 (ma)
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The motions to dismiss (Docs. 20 & 23 ) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1) The motion to dismiss (Doc. 20) the section 1983 claims against DOC Defendants in their official capacities is GRANTED with prejudi ce; 2) The motion to dismiss (Doc. 20) Defendant SCI-Smithfield as a party is GRANTED with prejudice, and State Prison Smithfield is dismissed as a party; 3) The motion to dismiss (Doc. 20) the section 1983 claims against Defendant DOC is GRANTED wit h prejudice; 4) The motion to dismiss (Doc. 20) the negligence claim based on medical malpractice is GRANTED with prejudice as to Defendant DOC; 5) The motion to dismiss (Doc. 20) Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference to serious medical needs is GRANTED with prejudice as to DOC Defendants; 6) The motions to dismiss (Docs. 20 & 23) Plaintiff's equal protection claim are GRANTED with prejudice; 7) The motion to dismiss (Doc. 23) the section 1983 claims against Def endant Corizon, Inc., is GRANTED with prejudice; 8) The motion to dismiss (Doc. 23) the Eighth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against Defendants Doll and Long is GRANTED without prejudice; 9) The motions to dismis s (Docs. 20 & 23) the pendant state law claims of negligence are GRANTED without prejudice, with the exception of the claim of negligence based on medical malpractice against Defendant DOC; and 10) Plaintiffs amended complaint shall be filed in accordance with the instructions set forth in the accompanying memorandum no later than March 11, 2013. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 02/22/13 (ma)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
