Giblin v. KCI Insurance Agency, Inc. et al
Richard Giblin |
KCI Insurance Agency, Inc. and Ronald Cooperman |
1:2012cv01648 |
August 20, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
York |
Christopher C. Conner |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER & JUDGMENT granting pltf's app 34 for entry of judgment - Jdgmt ENTERED in favor of Giblin & against defts in amount of $5,400.00. (See order & jdgmt for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 12/10/15. (ki) |
Filing 29 ORDER (Memorandum 28 filed previously as separate docket entry) -It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Pltf's motion 15 is GRANTED.; 2. Stay entered by court 9/11/12 LIFTED.; 3. W/in 14 days of date of this order defts shall sign settlement agmt & g en release attached as Doc. 16, Ex 28, & comply w/its terms consistent w/ accompanying memo 28 .; 4. Parties shall meet & confer re: appropriate amt of Giblin's attys' fees & appropriate period of time for pymt of amt currently due & owing from 10/13 to present.; 5. W/in 14 days of date of this order pltf shall file letter w/ court informing court whether there are any outstanding matters or whether matter may be closed. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 7/7/14. (ki) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.