Arredondo-Meza v. Fenstermaker et al
| Ivan Arredondo-Meza |
| United States of America |
| Mediator |
| 1:2012cv02457 |
| December 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Wayne |
| William W. Caldwell |
| Martin C. Carlson |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Conditions) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS/ORDER REFEAND NOW, this 9th day of January, 2013, upon consideration of the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 7), filed December 11, 2012, to which no objections were filed, and upon ind ependent review of the record, it is ordered that: 1. The magistrate judges report is adopted. 7 2. Petitioners motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiffs complaint 1 is dismissed as to the individual defendant, E rika Fenstermaker. 4. The clerk of court is directed to issue process to the United States Marshal, who shall serve the Plaintiffs Complaint (doc. 1) upon the Defendant, the United States, in accordance with Rule of Civil Procedure 4(I). 5. The above-captioned case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings, including a Report and Recommendation on dispositive motions, if necessary. Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 1/9/13. (am)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
