Wright et al v. Thomas et al
| Kayla Wright and Amber Callahan |
| Nanette Thomas and Tod F. Kline |
| 1:2013cv00804 |
| March 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Huntingdon |
| Christopher C. Conner |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Report of Magistrate Judge Carlson 21 recommending that the ct deny pltfs' motion to remand 6 is ADOPTED in its entirety.; 2. Pltfs' motion to remand to CCP Huntingdon County DENIED.; 3. Report of M agistrate Judge Carlson 22 recommending that ct dismiss pltf's compalint is ADOPTED to the extent it recommends dismissal of pltfs' fed claims w/ prejudice - the ct declines to adopt the portion of report recommending dismissal w/out pre judice of pltfs' remaining state law claims.; 4. Defts' MTD 3 GRANTED to extent it seeks dismissal of pltfs' fed claims & DENIED in all other respects.; 5. Pltfs' fed due process & 42 USC Section 1983 claims DISMISSED w/ prejudicce.; 6. Matter REMANDED to Ct of Common Pleas of Huntingdon Co, PA, for resolution of remaining state law claims. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 12/4/13. (ki)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
