Vernon v. Custer et al
| Tyrik Vernon |
| Linda Chismar, George Miller, A. Luscavage, Lisa Kerns-Barr, Robin Lewis, David Varano, John Wetzel, Charles Custer and Lt. Shipe |
| 1:2013cv01497 |
| June 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Greene |
| Martin C. Carlson |
| John E. Jones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) - For all of the foregoing reasons, we find that Vernons amended complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and must be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on May 7, 2014. (kjn)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 37 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint filed by Tyrik Vernon. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on 4/15/14. (pw)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the defendants motion to dismiss (Doc. 25) is GRANTED and the amended complaint (Doc. 20) is DISMISSED without prejudice to the plaintiff filing an amended complaint to address the pleading deficiencies that we have identified for him, provided that the defendant acts within 30 days of this dismissal order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on December 3, 2013. (kjn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
