Popko v. Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center et al
| David J. Popko |
| Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Greg Wantland and Mary Ann Kreiser |
| 1:2013cv01845 |
| July 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Lebanon |
| Yvette Kane |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry),for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendants motion for summary judgment 66 is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and close this case. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 3/22/17. (rw)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Doc. No. 29) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Defendants motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution (Doc. No. 42) is DENIED. 42 29 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT a Status Conference is set for 9/11/2015 at 11:30 AM. Dfts cnsl shall initiate the call. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 8/19/15. (sc)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART 13 . 1. Plaintiffs claims under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 P.S. & #167; 951, et seq. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 2. Plaintiffs claims under the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 3. Plaintiffs age iscrimination claim under the Age Discrimination in E mployment Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 621, et seq. is not dismissed; to the extent also Plaintiff allegesa hostile work environment under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, itis DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 4. Plaintiffs retaliation claim under Fa mily Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 2601, et seq. is not dismissed; Plaintiffs interference claim under the Family Medical Leave Act is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 5. Plaintiffs claim under Title VII is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and 6. Plaintiffs breach of contract claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 7. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within 21 days of the date of this order. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 7/14/14. (sc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
