Buckley v. State Correctional Institution - Pine Grove et al
| Stephen Buckley |
| State Correctional Institution - Pine Grove and Pennsylvania Department of Corrections |
| 1:2013cv02022 |
| July 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Indiana |
| John E. Jones |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)1. Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Supplemented Administrative Record (Doc. 36) is GRANTED. 2. Defendants Cross Motion for Judgment on the Supplemented Administrative Record (Doc. 38) is DENIED. 3. The decision of the Hearing Officer is REVERSED to the extent it ruled that Plaintiff was not denied a FAPE and declined to award compensatory education. It is AFFIRMED in all other respects. 4. Plaintiff is AWARDED full days of compensatory education for theschool days during which he was confined in SCI-Pine Groves Restricted Housing Unit. 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the file on this case. (eo)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting pltf's Motion to submit additional evidence 18 . Dfts shall submit any expert report withing 30 days of the date of this order.Signed by Honorable John E. Jones, III on 01/06/14 (ma)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
