Brown v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
| Dawn L. Brown |
| Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections, Michael Harmon, Brian Hoerner, Jonathan Hepner and James Meintel |
| 1:2014cv00201 |
| February 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Cumberland |
| Christopher C. Conner |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER & JUDGMENT adopting report 47 of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick, construing pltf's corrs 46 as motion for voluntary dismissal of remaining claim against Harmon & granted as so construed, DISMISSING pltf's complaint w/ re: deft Harmo n, JUDGMENT ENTERED in favor of all other defts & against pltf as set forth in ct's order 43 dated 2/27/17, & directing Clrk of Ct to close case. (See order & jdgmt for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 5/31/17. (ki)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT 42 of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick, GRANTING MSJ 29 by defts Hepner, Hoerner, Meintel & PA DOC, DEFERRING entry of jdgmt pending final resolution of litigation & REMANDING matter to Magistrate Judge Mehalchick for futher pretrial proceedings re: remaining deft. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 2/27/17. (ki)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
