Chandler v. Smith et al
Plaintiff: Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr.
Defendant: J. Diltz, Cindy Smith, Susann Stover and Gregory K. Baker
Case Number: 1:2014cv00245
Filed: February 12, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Union
Presiding Judge: EC
Presiding Judge: Christopher C. Conner
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER (Memorandum 74 filed previously as separate docket entry) - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defts' MSJ 62 DEEMED unopposed & GRANTED.; 2. Clrk of Ct directed to ENTER jdgmt in favor of defts & against pltf.; 3. Clrk of Ct directed to CLOSE case.; 4. Any appeal from this order DEEMED frivolous & not in good faith. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 12/29/14. (ki)
November 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER denying pltf's motions for default judgment 55 , 58 , 61 & 66 . (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 11/3/14. (ki)
June 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER (Memorandum 27 filed previously as separate docket entry) - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Pltf's request to proceed IFP 2 GRANTED in part & DENIED in part.; 2. GR'd w/ re: 8th Amend deliberate indifference to serious med needs cla im vs defts Smith & Baker.; 2. DN'd w/ re: claims vs defts Diltz & Stover - those claims DISMISSED w/out prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g) & Clrk of Ct direced to TERM said defts.; 4. Clrk of Ct directed to FORWARD consolidated complaint 26 & copy of this order to USM for svc on defts Smith & Baker. ; 6. Pltf's motion to produce evidence 24 DENIED. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 6/24/14. (ki)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chandler v. Smith et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Diltz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cindy Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Susann Stover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory K. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?