ABT Systems, LLC v. Research Products Corporation

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Middle District ABT Systems, LLC v. Research Products Corporation

ABT Systems, LLC v. Research Products Corporation

Plaintiff:	ABT Systems, LLC
Defendant:	Research Products Corporation
Case Number:	1:2014cv02007
Filed:	October 16, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Harrisburg Office
County:	Lebanon
Presiding Judge:	Yvette Kane
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 14, 2017	Filing 95 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff ABT Systems, LLCs motion 67 to compel discovery is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion 67 to c ompel as to ABT Interrogatory No. 4. Defendant is directed to fully respond to ABT Interrogatory No. 4 within thirty (30) days of this Order; b. In all other respects, the motion to compel is DENIED;2. Plaintiff ABT Systems, LLCs motions 70 & 76 to place documents under seal are GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff ABT Systems, LLCs unopposed motion 74 for an extension of time is DENIED AS MOOT; and 4. Plaintiff ABT Systems, LLCs motion 84 for a status conference is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to schedule a status conference. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 6/14/17. (rw)
June 8, 2016	Filing 62 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant Research Products Corporations motion for leave to file its Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims (Doc. No. 49), is GRANTED. The Cler k of Court is directed to docket exhibit located at Doc. No. 49-1, Defendants proposed Amended Answer. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT, on or before June 21, 2016, the parties shall each file a supplemental brief addressing the appropriateness of a claim construction hearing by the district court. 49 Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 6/8/16. (sc)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 14, 2017

Filing 95 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff ABT Systems, LLCs motion 67 to compel discovery is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion 67 to c ompel as to ABT Interrogatory No. 4. Defendant is directed to fully respond to ABT Interrogatory No. 4 within thirty (30) days of this Order; b. In all other respects, the motion to compel is DENIED;2. Plaintiff ABT Systems, LLCs motions 70 & 76 to place documents under seal are GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff ABT Systems, LLCs unopposed motion 74 for an extension of time is DENIED AS MOOT; and 4. Plaintiff ABT Systems, LLCs motion 84 for a status conference is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to schedule a status conference. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 6/14/17. (rw)

June 8, 2016

Filing 62 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant Research Products Corporations motion for leave to file its Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims (Doc. No. 49), is GRANTED. The Cler k of Court is directed to docket exhibit located at Doc. No. 49-1, Defendants proposed Amended Answer. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT, on or before June 21, 2016, the parties shall each file a supplemental brief addressing the appropriateness of a claim construction hearing by the district court. 49 Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 6/8/16. (sc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ABT Systems, LLC v. Research Products Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: ABT Systems, LLC
Represented By:	Dana D Alvarado
Represented By:	Michael P Mazza
Represented By:	Jonathan H. Rudd
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Research Products Corporation
Represented By:	Lauren P. McKenna
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?