Kraska v. Clark et al
| Michael J. Kraska |
| Lawrence F. Clark, Jr., John/Jane Doe 1-10, Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts and Dauphin County, Pennsylvania |
| 1:2014cv02120 |
| November 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Dauphin |
| John E. Jones |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)1. The Motions to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, (Docs. 20, 21, 37), are GRANTED. a. Defendant Judge Lawrence F. Clark, Jr.s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint, (Doc. 21), is GRANTED to the extent Judge Clark is protected from this suit by judicial immunity. The claims against him are DISMISSED with prejudice. b. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendant Clark as a party to this action. c. The claims against all other Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. The Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to amend his pleading within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order to the extent there are facts which, if true, support the Plaintiffs claims against the Sheriff Defendants, the Sheriffs Office, and Dauphin County. If the Plaintiff does not file an amended pleading in that time, the above dismissal of those claims will be deemed prejudicial. (eo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
