Rascoe et al v. Cody et al
Michelle C. Rascoe and Rascoe Courts, Inc. |
Neil Cody, George Drees, Gerald S. Robinson, James A. Lenker, Andrew P. Maloney, Bureau of Human Services, Licensing, Susquehanna Township Fire Dept. and Bureau of Hearing and Appeals |
1:2015cv00994 |
May 21, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
Dauphin |
Christopher C. Conner |
Joseph F. Saporito |
Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT 56 of Magistrate Judge Arbuckle, GRANTING defts' MTDs 48 & 49 , DISMISSING pltfs' 3rd amended complaint 20 with prejudice & directing Clrk of Ct to CLOSE case. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 7/2/18. (ki) |
Filing 41 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT 37 of Magistrate Judge Saporito, GRANTING Susquehanna defts' MTD 29 to extend pltfs' amended complaint 20 is subject to dismissal on timeliness grounds, DISMISSING pltfs' amended complaint w/out prejudice, DENYING Cody's MTD 32 as MOOT,granting pltfs leave to file 2nd amended complaint w/in 30 days of date of this order..., setting forth instructions re: content & filing req'mts for any such 2nd amended complaint, & directing that Clrk of Ct shall CLOSE case in absence of timely-filed 2nd amended complaint. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 2/10/17. (ki) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.