Keller v. Blauser et al
| Barry Lee Keller |
| Christopher Blauser, Jenine Quigley and Prime Care Medical |
| 1:2015cv01225 |
| June 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| York |
| EC |
| John E. Jones |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)1. Plaintiffs motion (Doc. 2) to proceed in forma pauperis is construed as a motion to proceed without full prepayment of fees and costs and is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiffs motion (Doc. 5) for sum mary judgment is DENIED as premature.3. Plaintiff shall FILE an amended complaint on or before August 4, 2015.4. The amended complaint shall contain the same case number that is already assigned to this action, 1:15-cv-1225, and shall be direct, conc ise, and shall stand alone without reference to any other document filed in this matter. See FED. R. CIV. P. 8(e). 5. Plaintiff is strictly cautioned that the inclusion of separate, unrelated claims will be considered a failure to comply with an orde r of court and may result in an order striking or dismissing the complaint. See FED. R. CIV. P. 20. 6. Failure to file an amended complaint within the specified time period will result in dismissal of the action for failure to comply with an order of court. (eo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
