Federal Trade Commission et al v. Penn State Hershey Medical Center et al
| Federal Trade Commission and Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania |
| Penn State Hershey Medical Center and Pinnaclehealth System |
| 1:2015cv02362 |
| December 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Dauphin |
| John E. Jones |
| Antitrust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0053 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
162
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)1. The Commonwealths Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs (doc. 143) is DENIED.2. Defendants Motion to Strike (doc. 152) a letter filed to the docket bythe Commonwealth (doc. 151) is obviated by the Commonwealths Notice (doc. 154) informing the Court that it has withdrawn that same letter. Accordingly, Defendants Motion to Strike (doc. 152) is TERMINATED. 3. The Clerk of the Court SHALL CLOSE the file on this case. (eo)
|
|
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - AND NOW, this 30th day of March 2016, IT IS ORDERED that on or before April 8, 2016, the plaintiffs shall file a fully unredacted complaint in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on March 30, 2016. (kjn)
|
|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that this witness identity also be disclosed, subject to the series of reasonable and prudent caveats previously imposed by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on February 29, 2016. (kjn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
