Ilarraza v. Chuta et al
| Julio E Rivera Ilarraza |
| James Chuta and Jennifer Hudson |
| 1:2015cv02406 |
| December 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Schuylkill |
| Sylvia H. Rambo |
| Joseph F. Saporito |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 50 ; 1) The report and recommendation of the magistrate judge Saporito 48 is ADOPTED.2) The motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute 41 is GRANTED and the complaint is DISMISSED.3) The Clerk of Court shall close this case.4) Any appeal from this order is deemed frivolous and not taken ingood faith. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 1/3/18. (ma)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER: 1) The report and recommendation of M.J. Saporito 31 is ADOPTED.2) Dft Chutas mtn 16 is GRANTED as to the pltfs Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Person Act (RLUIPA) claim.3) The mtn is DENIED as to the pltfs First Amendment claim.4) The matter is remanded to the M.J. for further proceedings.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 4/3/17. (ma)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)DENYING Doc. 2 motion for appointment of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 4/4/16. (ms)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
