Carlson et al v. Kane et al
| Michael A. Carlson and Michael J. Cranga |
| Kathleen G. Kane and Jonathan Duecker |
| 1:2015cv02452 |
| December 21, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Dauphin |
| Christopher C. Conner |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that pltfs' objections 63 @ 20-22 to defts' privilege log are OVERRULED. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 8/10/17. (ki)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER (Memorandum 47 filed previously as separate docket entry) DENYING MTDs 17 & 19 & directing defts to respond to pltfs' complaint 1 in acc w/ FRCP. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 12/21/16. (ki)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting pltfs' motion to substitute parties & amend caption 44 .(See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 11/23/16. (ki)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting joint motion to stay 36 , STAYING matter & defts' MTDs admin termed w/out prejuice to reinstate pending resolution of criminal proceedings against deft Kane in Montgomery Count CCP, & directing Kane to notify ct w/in 15 days of resolution of same. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 6/7/16. (ki) Modified on 6/7/16 correct typo (ki)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
