Gosch v. International Chapter of Horseshoers and Equine Trades, Local 947
Plaintiff: Austin Gosch
Defendant: International Chapter of Horseshoers and Equine Trades, Local 947
Case Number: 1:2016cv00544
Filed: March 30, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Dauphin
Presiding Judge: William W. Caldwell
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29:185
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 5 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Austin Gosch. Signed by the Honorable William W. Caldwell on August 3, 2016. (kjn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gosch v. International Chapter of Horseshoers and Equine Trades, Local 947
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Austin Gosch
Represented By: Kathryn L. Simpson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: International Chapter of Horseshoers and Equine Trades, Local 947
Represented By: Ira H. Weinstock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?