Jones v. Tritt et al
| Barry Jones |
| Brenda Tritt, Downs, Hardwood, Haresh Pandya, Nelson Iannuzzi, NP, Vickie Stanishefski and Daniel Zaramber |
| 1:2016cv01537 |
| July 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Schuylkill |
| PT |
| William W. Caldwell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry).(1) The Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment 55 filed by Plaintiff is DENIED. (2) The Motion for Summary Judgment 59 filed by Defendant Haresh Pandya is DENIED. (3) This Matter is placed on the June 2019 Trial List.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 2/20/19. (dw)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 47 : 1. Dr. Pandya and CRNP Iannuzzis mtn to dismiss 25 is granted in part and denied in part.2. CRNP Iannuzzis mtn to dismiss Jones Eighth Amendment claims against him is granted.3. Dr. Pandyas mt n to dismiss Jones Eighth Amendment claim concerning the treatment of his sarcoidosis is denied.4. The DOC Dfts mtn for judgment on the pleadings 44 is granted.5. The sole surviving claim in this action lies against Dr. Pandya.6. Dr. Pandya is granted (21) days from the date of this order to file an answer to the Complaint. Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 10/5/17. (ma)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
