Joseph v. Naji, et al
George Joseph |
M. Naji, J. Pearson, Casyn Thornley, Paul Noel, Eugene Ginchereau and Dorina Varner |
1:2016cv01870 |
September 12, 2016 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
Dauphin |
Susan E. Schwab |
Yvette Kane |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS ORDERED THAT:1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation 43 of Magistrate Judge Schwab; 2. The Commonwealth Defendants motion 15 to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows: a. Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Varner is GRANTED; b. Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claim against Defendants Pearson, Noel, and Ginchereau is DENIED; c. Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiffs conspiracy claim against the Commonwealth Defendants is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Varner is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 4. Plaintiffs conspiracy claim against the Commonwealth Defendants is D ISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;5. Plaintiff is directed to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order that corrects the pleading deficiencies identified in the Report and Recommendation; and 6. The above-captioned action is recommitted to Magistrate Judge Schwab for further pretrial management. Sigbned by Honorable Yvette Kane on 5/31/17. (rw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.