Montalban v. Powell et al
| Jose Montalban |
| Powell, Verbyla Williams, Jason Glossenger, Patricia Burgerholff, Moddroff, John Doe, Walter Dobushak, M. Kabonick, Jarrett Tuttle, John Doe's, ., Anthony Pedone, Mark Brennan and Corey Vrabel |
| 1:2017cv00212 |
| February 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Wayne |
| PT |
| William W. Caldwell |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 72 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Jose Montalban Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 1/14/20. (sm)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), GRANTING Dfts' 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment; Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Dfts and CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 1/15/19. (sm)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER: In accord with the accompnying Memorandum 40 ; Pltf's mtn for "Preliminary Restrain Order" 38 is Denied.Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 10/31/17. (ma)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry). Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 7/13/17. (rw)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 17 ; Pltf's mtn for apptmnt of cnsl 9 is Denied.Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 4/7/17. (ma)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
