Priset v. Attorney General of PA
Petitioner: Matthew D. Priset
Respondent: Attorney General of PA
Case Number: 1:2017cv00336
Filed: February 23, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Tioga
Presiding Judge: GS
Presiding Judge: Yvette Kane
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 17 ; 1. The writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 1 is DISMISSED with prejudice;2. A certificate of appealability will not issue. 3. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 5/18/18. (ma)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Priset v. Attorney General of PA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Matthew D. Priset
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of PA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?