Pinson v. United States et al
Plaintiff: Jeremy V. Pinson
Defendant: United States, Elizabeth Santos and M Magyar
Case Number: 1:2017cv00584
Filed: April 3, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Union
Presiding Judge: RM
Presiding Judge: Sylvia H. Rambo
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 59 , pltf's mtn for reconsideration 58 is Denied.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 8/13/18. (ma)
February 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 55 ; 1. Pltfs second mtn for discovery before summary judgment briefing 42 , is DENIED as moot;2. Dfts mtn for summary judgment 20 0), is GRANTED in favor of Dfts Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America, AHSA Magyar, and Dr. Stahl (formerly E. Santos); and3. The Clerk of Court shall enter the grant of summary judgment as statedabove and CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 2/26/18 (ma)
November 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 40 ; 1. Pltfs mtn for exttm 33 , is GRANTED to the extent that Pltf is afforded (30) days in which to obtain an affidavit from former cellmate Timothy Beckwith andpsychologist Richard Samuels;2. Bri efing on Dfts mtn for summary judgment is STAYED in accordance with the ddls prescribed by this Order below;3. Pltfs unopposed mtn for an exttm in which to file a bropp to Dfts mtn for summary judgment (Doc. No. 33) is GRANTED to the extent that Pltf shall file a bropp to Dfts mtn for summary judgment, together with a counterstatement of facts by 2/7/18;4. Dfts shall be permitted to file a reply brief in further support oftheir mtn for summary judgment on or before 2/22/18;5. No further briefing on the mtn for summary judgment shall be permitted without leave of Court; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:6. Pltfs mtn to appoint counsel 36 , is DENIED; and7. Pltfs mtn for a preliminary injunction 38 , is DENIED.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 11/7/17. (ma)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pinson v. United States et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeremy V. Pinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elizabeth Santos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M Magyar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?