VAN SANT v. CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
| Keith Van Sant |
| Choice Hotels International, Inc., Quality Inn Enola and Kumar, Inc. |
| 1:2017cv01552 |
| August 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Outside State |
| John E. Jones |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER granting in part and denying in part defts' MIL 91 to preclude testimony of Mr. Scott D. Moore... (see paras 1a-d for specifics); & directing that before 5:00 p.m. oin 2/7/20 - a. Cnsl shall file joint letter listing exhibits to which t here is still an obj or objs & outlining each party's position as to the obj or objs; b. Cnsl for pltf shall file a stip dismissing Choice Hotels Internat'l, Inc.; & c - after discussing the issues & attempting in good faith to resolve any issues re: testimony about video of Mr. Van Sant's fall, if there remains any issues, cnsl shall file jt letter outlining each party's position on the issues. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on 2/5/20. (ki)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). IT IS ORDERED that the defendants' motion 41 for summary judgment is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on 3/28/2019. (ktt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
