S. et al v. York County et al
| B. S. and R. S. |
| York County, Nan Mavor, Cathy Lyman and Jacy Nemec |
| 1:2017cv01789 |
| October 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| York |
| Yvette Kane |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) granting 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jacy Niemiec, York County, Ashley Rohrbaugh. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment for the remaining Defendants on Counts I to III of the amended complaint, Doc. 42, and is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 9/10/2020. (ve)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 28) is GRANTED; 2. The First Amended Complaint, attached as an Exhibit to Plaintiffs Motion (Doc. No. 28-3), is DEEMED FILED as of this date; 3. Discovery related to the issue of liability is REOPENED for a period of ninety(90) days from the date of this Order; and 4. Dispositive motions related to the issue of liability shall be filed 120 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 7/22/2019. (ve)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
