Rider v. Castro et al
| Rodney Rider |
| Albaro Castro, Steven Ringby, Carbon County Correctional Facility, Timothy Fritz, Tye and John Doe Defendants 1-10 |
| 1:2018cv00802 |
| April 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Carbon |
| William I. Arbuckle |
| John E. Jones |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation 35 of Magistrate Judge Arbuckle is ADOPTED in its entirety. 2. The Defendants Motion 28 for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. Summary judgment is DENIED with respect to Plaintiffs failure to protect claim against Defendant Castro and Plaintiffs failure to provide adequate medical care claims against Defendants Castroand Knecht. b. Summary judgment is GRA NTED in all other respects. c. The Clerk shall TERMINATE all Defendants with the exception of Defendants Castro and Knecht. 3. This matter is REMANDED to Magistrate Judge Arbuckle for the purposes of determining whether the parties are willing to su bmit to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge for trial or whether the parties are interested in mediation with the Magistrate Judge. Judge Arbuckle shall report his findings to the undersigned. Signed by Honorable John E. Jones, III on 2/24/20. (rw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
