Middletown Borough v. Middletown Water Joint Venture LLC
| Middletown Borough |
| Middletown Water Joint Venture LLC |
| 1:2018cv00861 |
| April 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Dauphin |
| Christopher C. Conner |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER (Memorandum 66 filed previously as separate docket entry) GRANTING deft's MTD 56 , DISMISSING amended complaint 45 & directing Clrk of Ct to CLOSE case. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 3/27/19. (ki)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER (Memorandum 47 filed previously as separate docket entry) DENYING pltf Middletown Borough's motion for preliminary injunction 6 . (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 7/19/18. (ki)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER denying deft's MTD 40 as MOOT & w/out prejudice & directing defts respond to amended complaint in acc w/ FRCP. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 7/18/18. (ki)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER APPROVING partis' joint stipulation 43 - docs outlined thereing admitted to evidentiary record; parties' objections to specific docs id'd in joint stip 33 OVERRULED. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 7/3/18. (ki)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
