Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al v. United States Postal Service et al
Jennifer Good and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company |
United States Postal Service and United States of America |
1:2018cv01634 |
August 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
York |
John E Jones |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jennifer Good, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Murphy, Joseph) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (aaa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Postal Service, United States of America ( Filing fee $400, Receipt Number 0314-4518367), filed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Jennifer Good. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s))(aaa) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/17/2018) (rw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.