Haubrick v. Boring Transport, Inc.
Plaintiff: Shane Haubrick
Defendant: Boring Transport, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv01638
Filed: August 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Mifflin
Presiding Judge: Sylvia H Rambo
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 10/4/18. (ma)
October 3, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement by Shane Haubrick (Mahan, Stephen)
September 7, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Hearing: The Case Management Conference has been continued from 10/18/18 to 10/25/2018 @ 2:30 PM before Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo.This conference is by phone with the call to be initiated by the pltf unless otherwise arranged. A joint case mgmnt plan is to be filed by 10/18/18. (ma)
August 31, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Hearing: A Case Management Conference has been set for 10/18/2018 @ 2:30 PM before Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo. This conference is by phone with the call to be initiated by the pltf unless otherwise arranged. A joint case mgmnt plan is to be filed by 10/11/18. (ma)
August 24, 2018 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by Shane Haubrick. Boring Transport, Inc. waiver sent on 8/17/2018, answer due 10/16/2018. (Mahan, Stephen)
August 22, 2018 Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Boring Transport, Inc.. (Henry, Schaun)
August 22, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Schaun D. Henry on behalf of Boring Transport, Inc. (Henry, Schaun)
August 17, 2018 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Boring Transport, Inc. and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (aaa)
August 17, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Boring Transport, Inc. ( Filing fee $400, Receipt Number 0314-4518698), filed by Shane Haubrick. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(aaa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haubrick v. Boring Transport, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shane Haubrick
Represented By: Derrek William Cummings
Represented By: Stephen Todd Mahan, Jr.
Represented By: Stephen P. Gunther
Represented By: Larry A. Weisberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boring Transport, Inc.
Represented By: Schaun D. Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?