U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v Fastenal Company
| U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Fastenal Company |
| 1:2018cv01753 |
| September 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Christopher C Conner |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER - Letter to Counsel from Court Re: Case Assignment and Procedures. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 9/18/18. (ki)
|
| Filing 7 SPECIAL ADMISSIONS FORM APPROVED as to Maria Luisa Morocco, Esquire.Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 9/17/18. (ki) |
| Filing 6 SPECIAL ADMISSIONS FORM APPROVED as to Ashley M. Martin, Esquire.Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 9/17/18. (ki) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Petitioner, Maria Morocco, bar status verified. (pjr) |
| Filing 5 Application Special Admission , PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Maria L. Morocco on behalf of U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, filed by on behalf of U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.(Morocco, Maria) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Fastenal Company waiver sent on 9/6/2018, answer due 11/5/2018. (Martin, Ashley) |
| SPECIAL ADMISSION FORM emailed to Attorney Maria Morocco (lg) |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Ashley M Martin on behalf of U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Attorney Ashley Martin is seeking special admission.. (Martin, Ashley) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Fastenal Company and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (pjr) (Main Document 2 replaced on 9/5/2018) (ma). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fastenal Company filed by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(pjr) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Petitioner, Ashley Martin bar status verified. (pjr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v Fastenal Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Fastenal Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
| Represented By: | Ashley M Martin |
| Represented By: | Maria L. Morocco |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
