Hartford v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
| Hakim Hartford |
| Dauphin County Prosecutor and Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania |
| 1:2018cv01831 |
| September 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| RM |
| Yvette Kane |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER with Notice of Limitations on Filing of Future Petitions Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254- IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1) Petitioners motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 , is GRANTED; 2) The Petitioner is directed, within forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order, to complete and return the Notice of Election form attached to this Order indicating Petitioners election to either withdraw his current petition or have the petition construed, and ruled on, under 28 U.S.C. 2254. See order for further details. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 10/17/18. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Election)(ve) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice & Consent Form) (rw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Hakim Hartford.(rw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION lodged pending disposition of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee NOT PAID), filed by Hakim Hartford.(rw) Modified on 10/3/2018 (jw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
