Williams v. Capozza et al
Petitioner: Robert C. Williams
Respondent: Superintendent Mark Capozza and PA Attorney General
Case Number: 1:2018cv01986
Filed: October 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: EBC
Referring Judge: John E Jones
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ELECTION by Robert C. Williams. (aaa)
November 29, 2018 Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Pro Se Letter. Mail sent to Robert C. Williams. Mail resent to PA address with notation, "Special Mail, Open Only in the Presence of Inmate." (aaa)
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER 1. Petitioners application (Doc. 4) for leave to proceed in formapauperis is GRANTED.2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DEEMED filed.3. Petitioner is granted leave to withdraw the current 2254 petitionwithout prejudice to file another 2254 petition raising all groundsfor relief from his conviction.4. Petitioner is granted forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order tonotify the Court of his decision. If he fails to do so, the Court willrule on the current 2254 petition as filed.5. If the limitations period would expire during this 45-day period, thelimitations period is tolled from the date of this Order untilPetitioners notification is filed, or until forty-five (45) days haveelapsed, whichever is earliest. In these circumstances, and ifPetitioner decides to file an all- inclusive 2254 petition raising allgrounds for relief, Petitioners response must also be accompanied byhis new 2254 petition. (eo)
November 1, 2018 Filing 4 Application To Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. (ga)
October 18, 2018 Filing 3 THHIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the petitioner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 10/18/2018. (Attachments: #1 IFP (Habeas Corpus))(lp)
October 16, 2018 Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (aaa)
October 16, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed by Robert C. Williams.(aaa) Modified on 10/25/2018 (aaa).
October 16, 2018 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Original paperwork forwarded by Scranton Clerk's Office. (aaa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Capozza et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Superintendent Mark Capozza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: PA Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert C. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?