Jacoby v. Wetzel et al
Petitioner: Timothy Matthew Jacoby
Respondent: John E. Wetzel, PA State Attorney General, Robert Gilmore and Mark Garman
Case Number: 1:2018cv02000
Filed: October 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: AM
Referring Judge: Yvette Kane
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER denying #2 Motion to Seal. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 12/7/18 (ve)
December 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER - IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 1) is GRANTED. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). 2. The motion to appoint counsel (Doc. No. 1) is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Capital Habeas Unit is APPOINTED to represent Petitioner Timothy M. Jacoby in the captioned action. See 18 U.S.C. 3599(a)(2); see also id. 3599(a)(2)(c). 3. Counsel for Petitioner shall file a status report apprising the Court of the procedural posture of Petitioners state court proceedings and any other pertinent matters within 180 days of the date of this Order, and every forty-five (45) days thereafter, or until further Order of Court. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 12/7/2018 (ve)
October 16, 2018 Filing 2 Petitioner's Motion for Leave to File Document Ex Parte and Under Seal, filed by Timothy Matthew Jacoby. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(rw)
October 16, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Timothy Matthew Jacoby. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order; #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (rw).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jacoby v. Wetzel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John E. Wetzel
Represented By: David W Sunday, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: PA State Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert Gilmore
Represented By: David W Sunday, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mark Garman
Represented By: David W Sunday, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Timothy Matthew Jacoby
Represented By: James T Lawley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?