Tyson v. Howard
| Jason J. Tyson |
| Catricia Howard |
| 1:2018cv02051 |
| October 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| CA |
| Christopher C Conner |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 TRAVERSE by Jason J. Tyson to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Lodged No FF and No Motion for IFP Filed), #10 Response to Petition for Habeas Corpus. (ga) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by Catricia Howard by Catricia Howard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Unpublished Opinion(s))(Dalke, Samuel) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting respondent's motion #8 for enlargement of time to file response to petition unil 11/30/18 & permitting ptnr to file reply w/in 14 days of date answer filed. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 11/15/18. (ki)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to file Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Catricia Howard. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dalke, Samuel) |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE, re: #4 Order to Show Cause. (rw) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE. (rw) |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIVED from US Attorney confirming receipt of 10/26/18 show cause order #4 & petition #1 . (ki) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER re: petition for writ of h/c #1 , directing Clrk of Ct to serve copy of petition & this order on respondent & US Atty, directing respondent to file w/in 21 days from date of this order an answer to petition, permitting ptnr to file reply to answer w/in 14 days of date answer filed & noting ct wil decide whether to hold hearing on basis of petition, answer &, if filed, reply. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 10/26/18. (ki)
|
| Receipt of payment from JASON J TYSON in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 10/24/2018. Receipt number 333062809 processed by epetrosk. (jjs, ) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: This case is deemed FILED (ep) |
| Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the petitioner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 10/24/2018. (Attachments: #1 IFP (Habeas Corpus))(lp) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (rw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, by Jason J. Tyson.(rw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tyson v. Howard | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jason J. Tyson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Catricia Howard | |
| Represented By: | Samuel Dalke |
| Represented By: | Kate Mershimer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
