Warrington v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
Scott Warrington |
John Doe Correctional Officers #1-10 and Pennsylvania Department of Corrections |
1:2019cv00237 |
February 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Christopher C Conner |
Karoline Mehalchick |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Scott Warrington as to John Doe Correctional Officers #1-10. (Simmons, Benjamin) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint served on PA Dept of Corrections on 02/25/2019, filed by Scott Warrington. (Simmons, Benjamin) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (dmn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400, Receipt Number 0314-4671545), filed by Scott Warrington.(dmn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.