Doss v. Bureau of Prison and It's Correctional Officers Federal Employees et al
| Darnell Doss |
| C/O Ready, Bureau of Prison and It's Correctional Officers Federal Employees, C/O Munchler, C/O Eckins, C/O Forah, C/O Updagraph, All other Officers Unknown Involved and C/O Yohn |
| 1:2019cv00272 |
| February 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| William I Arbuckle |
| John E Jones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Letter by Darnell Doss re #6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (bg) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darnell Doss.(bg) Modified on 3/15/2019 (lp). Certified inmate statement attached. |
| Filing 5 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 02/19/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP (Civil Rights))(lp) |
| Filing 4 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER issued on 2/15/19. (Attachments: #1 285 Service Packet with IFP Notice)(rw) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (rw) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION filed by Darnell Doss. (rw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Darnell Doss.(rw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
