Smith et al v. Hill
June D. Smith and Billy Ray Smith |
Luke Hill |
1:2019cv00440 |
March 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Luke Hill and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (rw) |
Receipt of payment from HOF AND REID, LLC in the amount of $400.00 for CIVIL FILING FEE. Transaction posted on 3/12/2019. Receipt number 333064843 processed by gangeli. (jjs, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher M. Reid & Issac A. Hof on behalf of Billy Ray Smith & June D. Smith. (rw) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1, filed by Billy Ray Smith & June D. Smith. (rw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Luke Hill ( Filing fee $400, Receipt Number 333064843), filed by June D. Smith & Billy Ray Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.