Maple v. Huber et al
| Eric Maple |
| Bartow, Hill, Adam Huber, Jennifer Digby and Alianello |
| 1:2019cv00554 |
| March 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| EBC |
| John E Jones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file an updated and signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 04/01/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP (civil rights))(lp) |
| Filing 6 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER informing the parties of the briefing and other responsibilities.Signed by Honorable John E. Jones, III on 4/1/19. (Attachments: #1 285 Service Packet with IFP Notice)(dmn) |
| Filing 5 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (dmn) |
| Filing 4 U.S. MARSHAL - 285, AO 398 and AO 399 Service Forms Completed by Plaintiff. (dmn) |
| Filing 3 AUTHORIZATION (Prisoner's Account Only). (dmn) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Eric Maple.(dmn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged pending the disposition of the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Eric Maple. (Attachments: #1 Continued)(dmn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
