Hollenback v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Centre County et al
| David James Hollenback |
| Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Centre County and PA State Attorney General |
| 1:2019cv01050 |
| June 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| EBC |
| John E Jones |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER - 1. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254is DISMISSED without prejudice to Petitioners right to seek therequisite authorization from the United States Court of Appeals for theThird Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2244(3)(A).2. The Clerk or Court is directed to NOTIFY Petitioner.3. The Clerk of Court is further directed to CLOSE this case. (eo)
|
| Filing 3 Request by David James Hollenback re filing fee receipt. (bg) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Copy of the docket mailed to Mr. Hollenback to show the filing fee was received. (bg) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (dmn) |
| Receipt of payment from DAVID HOLLENBACK in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 6/20/2019. Receipt number 333066290 processed by gangeli. (jjs, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, Receipt Number 333066298), filed by David James Hollenback. (Attachments: #1 Receipt)(dmn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
