Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
| Strike 3 Holdings, LLC |
| John Doe |
| 1:2019cv01076 |
| June 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| John E Jones |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the #6 Motion to Serve Third Party Subpoena is GRANTED subject to the conditions noted in the order. Signed by Honorable John E. Jones, III on 8/21/2019. (sc)
|
| Filing 7 BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE re #6 MOTION Motion for Leave to Serve Third Party Subpoena (EX PARTE RELIEF SOUGHT) filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC.(Klein, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 MOTION Motion for Leave to Serve Third Party Subpoena (EX PARTE RELIEF SOUGHT) by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memo In Support of Ex Parte Motion, #2 Declaration Fieser Declaration In Support of Ex Parte Motion, #3 Declaration Lansky Declaration In Support of Ex Parte Motion, #4 Declaration Stalzer Declaration In Support of Ex Parte Motion, #5 Proposed Order, #6 Appendix of Unpublished Cases)(Klein, Jonathan) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Counsel is advised to refile their Brief in Support to Document 6 as a seperate document. This event can be located under Responses and Replies. (aaa) |
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Conference set for 8/30/2019 01:15 PM before Honorable John E. Jones III. Counsel must utilize the dates on the attached calendar in their JCMP when a term is selected.(eo)
|
| Filing 4 AO 121 sent to Register of Copyrights. (aaa) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Media Systems, LLC for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC.. (Klein, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to John Doe and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (aaa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe ( Filing fee $400, Receipt Number 0314-4796726), filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s))(aaa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan D. Klein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
