Allen v. Berryhill
Joseph John Allen |
Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Saul |
1:2019cv01109 |
June 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Susan E Schwab |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff shall, within 90 days of the date he filed the complaint, serve the summons and the complaint on the defendant in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4, and plaintiff shall file a return of service within 90 days of the date he filed the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on 7/10/2019. (ktt) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill and provided TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (aaa) |
Receipt of payment from JOSEPH ALLEN in the amount of $400.00 for CIVIL FILING FEE. Transaction posted on 6/28/2019. Receipt number 111023976 processed by bdanilow. (tp) |
Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER issued and given to Plaintiff. (aaa) |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (aaa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill ( Filing fee $400, Receipt Number 111023976), filed by Joseph John Allen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(aaa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.